An argument against the establishment of single sex schools and classroom

Con Eventually, it could be hard for students to assimilate into "mixed gender" society. Some say kids focus better and learn more readily when that attraction and distraction is taken out of the equation. Legal Issues The issue of single-sex education has its legal supporters and detractors as well.

Leonard Sax and others agree that merely placing boys in separate classrooms from girls accomplishes little. If the single-sex education movement continues, you may find yourself in a position to vote for or against it in your own community.

As the debate heats up, it helps to understand all sides of the issue. But experts point out that girls can be just plain mean to each other, particularly adolescents. Putting this research into practice, however, has triggered a debate that extends beyond pure academics.

More than one-third of Americans feel parents should have the option of sending their child to a single-sex school. What is fueling this movement? But single-sex education enhances student success when teachers use techniques geared toward the gender of their students.

Single-sex education: the pros and cons

But this argument is effectively based on stereotypes. One mother, whose daughter has attended a girls-only school for three years, shared her experience on the GreatSchools parent community: It remains to be proven whether single-sex classrooms are beneficial to students.

Does single-sex education boost academic success? A driving force in the single-sex education movement is recent research showing natural differences in how males and females learn.

Professor Analia Schlosser, an economist from the Eitan Berglas School of Economics at Tel Aviv, found that elementary school, co-ed classrooms with a majority of female students showed increased academic performance for both boys and girls. In high school, the classrooms with the best academic achievement were consistently those that had a higher percentage of girls.

Pro Teachers can employ instruction techniques geared toward specific genders. For a sensitive boy or an assertive girl, the teaching style promoted by advocates of single-sex education could be ineffective at best or detrimental at worst.Single-sex schools benefit the students because the students have better academic performance, they eliminate stereotypes in the classroom and the students have fewer distractions.

Research indicates that girls from single-sex schools perform better academically than the ones in co-ed schools. Boys learn with boys and girls learn with girls and the two don’t meet, at least not during school hours.

Pros and Cons of Single-Sex Education

The idea is gaining some momentum in the millennium. About public schools were single-sex institutions inaccording to the National Association for Single Sex Public Schools. In recent decades arguments for and against single-sex education have heated up. Many parents realize that the choice between single-gender and coeducational schooling has important implications for the academic, psychological and.

Arguments against single-gender schools tend to come from people (typically males) who value children having romantic relationships with members of the opposite sex at this stage of their lives. But mixed-gender schools create distractions that prevent students from achieving their fullest academic potential.

In recent years, many school districts have introduced programs that allow for expanded use of single-sex education, often presenting these programs as quick-fix solutions to the array of problems facing many public schools.

Inthe No Child Left Behind Act added a provision giving single-sex classrooms and schools the ability to exist as long as they are voluntary.

From tothe number of single-sex schools in the United States rose from 3 to

An argument against the establishment of single sex schools and classroom
Rated 5/5 based on 44 review